Re: RE: Rubber comnparison

From: Phedon Tsiknopoulos <phedon21t_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:01:07 -0800

So according to you high energy release is a bad thing.
What if one can harness that high energy release and start doing 50 minutes plus with an F1D, how would you feel then?

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:38 PM, Tapio Linkosalo <tapio.linkosalo_at_iki.fi> wrote:

>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jake Palmer <82.jake_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If it's Tan SS, then you're probably seeing most of that energy at the top end. Indoor models are not good at using the initial burst at the very top end. 5/99 is so good because it has the best cruise torque.
>>
> Even if the energy was in the initial burst, I have yet to see any SS that would have an overall better energy return than 5/99. Ok, I have not tested for over a year now, and there are comments that latest batches of SS are even better than 5/99 (for F1B fliers), but I do not think SS would reach 15% over 5/99. So Phedon must have a very special batch of something quite different than Tan SS or Tan II rubber in his hands. Sounds good, just like the material to make super-strong 100mg motor tubes!
>
>
>
>
> -Tapio-
>
>
>
Received on Tue Feb 11 2014 - 01:01:08 CET