Re: RE: Rubber comnparison

From: Phedon Tsiknopoulos <phedon21t_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:33:06 -0800

I have, the Jul 2010 has, also the Jan 2011 has better release than the 5/99, they are both in the high 4300.

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:38 PM, Tapio Linkosalo <tapio.linkosalo_at_iki.fi> wrote:

>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jake Palmer <82.jake_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If it's Tan SS, then you're probably seeing most of that energy at the top end. Indoor models are not good at using the initial burst at the very top end. 5/99 is so good because it has the best cruise torque.
>>
> Even if the energy was in the initial burst, I have yet to see any SS that would have an overall better energy return than 5/99. Ok, I have not tested for over a year now, and there are comments that latest batches of SS are even better than 5/99 (for F1B fliers), but I do not think SS would reach 15% over 5/99. So Phedon must have a very special batch of something quite different than Tan SS or Tan II rubber in his hands. Sounds good, just like the material to make super-strong 100mg motor tubes!
>
>
>
>
> -Tapio-
>
>
>
Received on Tue Feb 11 2014 - 00:33:11 CET