Re: RE: Rubber comnparison

From: Tapio Linkosalo <tapio.linkosalo_at_iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:38:40 +0200

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jake Palmer <82.jake_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> If it's Tan SS, then you're probably seeing most of that energy at the top
> end. Indoor models are not good at using the initial burst at the very top
> end. 5/99 is so good because it has the best cruise torque.
>
> Even if the energy was in the initial burst, I have yet to see any SS that
would have an overall better energy return than 5/99. Ok, I have not tested
for over a year now, and there are comments that latest batches of SS are
even better than 5/99 (for F1B fliers), but I do not think SS would reach
15% over 5/99. So Phedon must have a very special batch of something quite
different than Tan SS or Tan II rubber in his hands. Sounds good, just like
the material to make super-strong 100mg motor tubes!




-Tapio-
Received on Mon Feb 10 2014 - 23:38:41 CET