Re: 2/99

From: <Warthodson_at_aol.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:16:27 EST

I have some 2/99 acquired form three different sources & my experience is the
it is noticeably lower in power than 5/99 & 3/02. Also, it seems to have a
less predictable breaking point. I had high expectations for it, but have been
disappointed. I keep all my rubber refrigerated.
Gary

In a message dated 11/19/2006 12:06:49 AM Central Standard Time,
ddeloach_at_adelphia.net writes:
I've recently acquired some 2/99. I know it is a good batch, but I've never
flown with it. As I understand it is not quite as good as the best 5/99, but
in the same league as 7/97 and 3/02.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Sun Nov 19 2006 - 06:34:37 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:44 CET