<<With regards to the max rule, how about a two minute max per flight, with
3 maxes getting you into a fly off. For the fly off, increase the max by a
minute per flight. Once you no longer max but other fliers do, you are out
of the fly off. This sounds really similar to how outdoor glider, P30, and
other outdoor AMA events work. I don't see why it wouldn't work indoor.
If that becomes too easy, set a max time and specify flights must be no
touch. That'll keep it interesting in Cat 1.>>
Chris,
This totally defeats the purpose of the Max Out rule. You put a beginner in
a fly off with Jim Richmond and he/she is gonna get creamed no matter what
the rules. Soon experts will be doing 4 minutes and dominating the event.
We need to de-incentivize the experts from pushing times up. The best way I
can think of to do this is to remove the ability for them to beat up on all
the beginners. They can tie them but they can't beat them except the ones
who can't do two minutes yet.
Remember this is entry level. We are not trying to reinvent the wheel. As
I've said I don't want to see these things doing 5 minutes. The day we do
the event has lost it's purpose. Oh and another thing, let's borrow a page
from FAC and be sure that no records are kept.
I know that what I am pushing is counter intuitive to the competition based
indoor mindset. I personally don't care who wins a P-18 event. It's purpose
is to attract beginners not 'win all costs' experts.
Bill C
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Chris pseshooter3d_at_yahoo.com
[Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> With regards to the max rule, how about a two minute max per flight, with
> 3 maxes getting you into a fly off. For the fly off, increase the max by a
> minute per flight. Once you no longer max but other fliers do, you are out
> of the fly off. This sounds really similar to how outdoor glider, P30, and
> other outdoor AMA events work. I don't see why it wouldn't work indoor.
> If that becomes too easy, set a max time and specify flights must be no
> touch. That'll keep it interesting in Cat 1.
>
> Chris
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 6, 2016, at 8:56 PM, William Carney wcarneyjx_at_gmail.com
> [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Chris,
>
> Thanks for the kind words. I'm hoping that the discussion soon moves from
> the rational for the event itself and moves to the active discussion about
> what the rules for the event will be.
>
> I have yet to see any cross discussion regarding my "Max Out" suggestion.
>
> Bill C
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Chris pseshooter3d_at_yahoo.com
> [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Bill C,
>>
>> You bring up some good points and your responses show thought and insight
>> into the event. Note that my questions are/were not because I do not favor
>> the event, but rather to see if another event was being added just for the
>> sake of it, or if there was a clear rationale.
>>
>> I might add though that sometimes we underestimate our beginners. I
>> worked with a student who prior to 2015 had 0 modeling experience. That
>> young man went to the Kent State contest and broke the Cat2 Jr. F1L record
>> and flew A6 within a minute of Gowen's time. Good performance in advanced
>> events is very possible for new fliers, provided they have a decent
>> mentor. If people who want to fly indoor are having a hard time finding a
>> mentor they are doing something terribly wrong as everyone I have met in
>> indoor, including the most competitive experts, are always willing to help.
>>
>> With luck P18 will serve as a good gateway model---"son, where did you
>> learn how to do this?"---"I learned it from watching you dad!!!" and the
>> more advanced events will grow. I for one would love to see 10+ F1Ls and
>> LPP's in the air at Kent.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 4:56 PM, William Carney wcarneyjx_at_gmail.com
>> [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hey Chris,
>>
>> Hear are my thoughts in response to your questions:
>>
>> <<I can see how P18 would attract new fliers. But then what? Are they
>> going to fly P18 forever? If the idea of competition in the other indoor
>> events is a barrier to entry for a lot of people, I would think that P18
>> only delays the inevitable.>>
>>
>> "Then what" is probably LPP and then what ever they like, maybe they get
>> to see some scale models flying indoor and get hooked on that.. P-18, if
>> kept at it's entry level operating style should give them confidence to
>> move. Maybe along the way they win a local contest or two scoring their
>> P-18 in LPP. By the time the do that They are an indoor flyer. Something we
>> need more of.
>>
>> <<I would also like to know what bag of tricks you are referring to that
>> "ruins" other events. >>
>>
>> The bag of expert tricks is deep and wide not just limited to building
>> and trimming. Experts also have access to rule changes. Remember what A-6
>> was like in the beginning?
>>
>> <<One just has to be willing to accept the techniques of the experts and
>> learn them.>>
>>
>> Having an airplane they can actually BUILD on their own without special
>> tools and equipment is crucial. Seeing their own handiwork fly is
>> something they will not forget. P-18 provides a learning platform that is
>> accessible to the average Joe. extraordinary candidates will move past it
>> quickly
>>
>> <<Again, I get how P18 could get fliers into the indoor scene, but how do
>> we keep them if they fear competition?>>
>>
>> We provide them an arena in which to gain confidence free from experts
>> getting scores they can't fathom achieving.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the discussion.
>>
>> Bill C
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Chris pseshooter3d_at_yahoo.com
>> [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I can see how P18 would attract new fliers. But then what? Are they
>>> going to fly P18 forever? If the idea of competition in the other indoor
>>> events is a barrier to entry for a lot of people, I would think that P18
>>> only delays the inevitable.
>>>
>>> I would also like to know what bag of tricks you are referring to that
>>> "ruins" other events. A mechanized VP prop would be the one thing that
>>> might give first time builders trouble. But for a weight restricted event
>>> like LPP or F1L, I just don't see anything out there that is too
>>> difficult. I think quite the opposite is happening actually. The modern
>>> LPP being built of carbon fiber is easier to build due to the fact that
>>> expensive balsa does not need to be graded and tested for stiffness. The
>>> carbon hub LPP prop that is being more widely used is also not difficult to
>>> construct. If one simply does some research, they will find that this
>>> indoor thing while difficult to master, is not difficult to get started
>>> in. One just has to be willing to accept the techniques of the experts and
>>> learn them.
>>>
>>> Again, I get how P18 could get fliers into the indoor scene, but how do
>>> we keep them if they fear competition?
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 2:47 PM, William Carney wcarneyjx_at_gmail.com
>>> [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The purpose is to attract new indoor flyers. The purpose of the Max Out
>>> suggestion is to keep it approachable to beginners. I'm not trying to
>>> discourage anybody from flying the event, just to keep them from ruining
>>> it. All of the experts' bag of tricks are useless and actually detrimental
>>> in the event. I don't want to see these things flying for 5 minutes.
>>>
>>> Bill C
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:40 PM, William Carney <wcarneyjx_at_gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good point Bill. We don't want this event to attract experienced
>>>> flyers. We want it to attract raw beginners. There does need to be a
>>>> balance though. For an event to be considered successful it must have
>>>> participants. I think a club who has a high number of experts who can Max
>>>> Out in P-18 might be a club who is having a lot of fun without ruining the
>>>> appeal of the event to beginners.
>>>>
>>>> Experts can fly this event all they want, but they are not going to
>>>> 'sour the milk' if all they can do is three maxes. Any real expert or
>>>> progressing new indoor flyer is going to see quickly that a real LPP will
>>>> be far superior to a P-18 and will want to build one to compete as such.
>>>>
>>>> Some will take many seasons to get there P-18 to do 2 minutes
>>>> consistently, during which time they are exposed to the sights and
>>>> atmosphere of indoor flying.
>>>>
>>>> Bill C
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:17 PM, William Gowen wdgowen_at_gmail.com
>>>> [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe you can just make a list of all the people who you consider too
>>>>> advanced to fly the event and attach that to the rules.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or maybe you can come up with a rule that anyone who has ever flown a
>>>>> legal AMA indoor duration model in their lifetime is barred from the event
>>>>>
>>>>> I really don't see that this event has any attraction for advanced
>>>>> fliers. I've already said that I won't fly it. And that doesn't mean that
>>>>> I'm opposed to the event.
>>>>> On Jun 5, 2016 8:51 PM, "William Carney wcarneyjx_at_gmail.com
>>>>> [Indoor_Construction]" <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ray,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I propose that this event be flown as a two minute max event. No fly
>>>>>> offs, no tie breakers. If an contestant wants to get full credit for
>>>>>> his/her efforts they may but the times are scored as an official in LPP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The purpose of this proposal is the remove the incentive of "Experts"
>>>>>> from flooding the event and making it unappealing to a true beginner. If
>>>>>> you can get one of these things to fly for two minutes three times in one
>>>>>> day you are probably ready to tackle a true LPP and then... By the time a
>>>>>> beginner has gotten enough experience to "Max Out" a P-18 he or she has set
>>>>>> the Indoor FF hook pretty deep.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The rules, as written, produce an airplane that make two minutes a
>>>>>> nominal goal. I kike seeing these models fly as they are very "indoor
>>>>>> like" and I've seen their appeal to the public. I just don't want to see
>>>>>> these things doing 5 minutes. Sure irt can probably be done but that is not
>>>>>> the point of the event.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bill C
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 3:54 PM, rbharlan_at_comcast.net
>>>>>> [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The cross proposal window is May 31 to July 15, so now is the time
>>>>>>> to submit any cross proposals.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I expect to submit one to change the prop size max to 6", instead of
>>>>>>> 5.5". There are a lot more 6" props out there than 5.5's, namely at Volare
>>>>>>> who has six kinds of 6" props.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I haven't checked for a specific cross proposal form at AMA, and, of
>>>>>>> course, if I check now, Yahoo will blow away all of this discourse and I
>>>>>>> don't want to type it again
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What other ideas do you have for the event, Bill?.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ray
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Received on Tue Jun 07 2016 - 11:43:11 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET