Hi Art,
I use method 3 most often but I'm not "married to it". I could easily get used to mode 1 or 2. Your winder is a pleasure to use.
Thanks,
David Phillips
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 17, 2016, at 4:18 PM, upwind120_at_gmail.com [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> I'd like to poll the CGWinder users, and this is where most of you are.
>
>
>
> There have always been 3 different modes of handling the windback count. Assume you want to wind 2000 turns in, and 350 back out….
>
>
>
> [1] Wind to 2000, zero the counter and wind back 350. I'm thinking that this is the most intuitive and the method most of you use.
>
>
>
> [2] Wind to 2000 and wind back to 2350. Awkward, but valid.
>
>
>
> [3] Wind to 2000, flip the subtract switch and wind back to 1650. Remember to flip the switch back.
>
>
>
> I'd like to go to an add-only counter. This would eliminate the toggle switch and 2 wires (3 solder joints), and make fabrication easier for these almost 80 year old hands and eyes. It would eliminate mode [3]. It would help hold the price. I'd add maybe $5-6 as an option for anyone who might want mode [3] . Don't know yet.
>
>
>
> Are any of you married to mode [3]?
>
>
>
> Art.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Feb 18 2016 - 04:18:26 CET
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET