Re: F1R

From: Eduardo Guerrero <edoguerr_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:34:48 -0700

Great!, Now the deal is to find a good source for F1R plans! (do you know
the secret source, Don?)

Eduardo / Tucson

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Don Slusarczyk don_at_slusarczyk.com
[Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:

>
>
> It is not clumsy it is brilliant. Not all events needs to be laden with
> multiple restrictions and 35cm has been flown by these simple rules for
> many years. It is one of the few indoor events left that allow complete
> creativity to the builder as they only have to satisfy the monoplane and
> wingspan rules. I personally am much more interested in flying F1R than the
> current restrictive rules used in F1D and F1M.
>
>
> On 9/25/2014 6:00 AM, 'John Barker' john.barker783_at_ntlworld.com
> [Indoor_Construction] wrote:
>
>
>
> Mike,
>
> Thanks for the quick reference to the correct FAI page. I am surprised at
> the clumsy wording and that the only requirements are a monoplane with a
> maximum span of 350mm. No stipulations as to airframe weight or rubber
> weight. I would expect this to raise some eyebrows.
>
> John
>
>
>
> *From:* Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com [
> mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>]
> *Sent:* 25 September 2014 02:41
> *To:* Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* [Indoor_Construction] Re: My Condenser Paper Offer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Don Slusarczyk
> www.DonsRC.com
> Home of the Wicked EDF Motors!
>
>
>



-- 
Eduardo Guerrero M.U.D.
Received on Thu Sep 25 2014 - 11:35:10 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET