Re: Analysis of the new F1D rules

From: <ykleetx_at_gmail.com>
Date: 16 Apr 2014 12:07:19 -0700

Joshua,
 Your post appeared to say that I was disingenuous in my presentation. If I mis-understood -- I apologize. I appreciate your post and your willingness to have a dialogue with me.
 

 The posts from many people have been vicious and pointed at Andras Ree. That there is an ulterior motive. As I have stated previously, I find these accusations unfounded, and in this forum, I object to the lack of civility displayed. Almost all of the reasons given in these posts are speculations and described in a very disrespectful way.
 

 Form my vantage point, the viciousness and lack of respect displayed here are contributing to an incredible amount of damage to the indoor community. The manner in which we debate or argue our differences show ourselves and others the type of people we are.
 

 I dis-agree with the rule change. I prefer the 0.6g rule. There's a reason I like the current rules -- perhaps I have more to lose than any of you with the rule change. I will contribute my time and energy to improve the rule-change process for the future. I will contribute to reversing this change. But I will not be part of this group's effort to ruin the reputation of Andras Ree.
 

 Regards,
 -Kang
 


Received on Wed Apr 16 2014 - 12:07:19 CEST