Re: Re: F1D rules change proposal

From: Nick Ray <lasray_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:44:46 -0500

Thank you to those of you have voted in the INAV poll. If you would like to
vote, but have not yet done so, please vote by 11:59pm EST on Saturday
2/22/14. At that time the results of the poll will be made available to the
CIAM.

Regards,

Nick

www.indoornewsandviews.com


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:04 PM, <leop_at_lyradev.com> wrote:

>
>
> There is a discussion ongoing in the Hip Pocket Aero site that connects
> the proposed rule change with the ability to add electronics to an F1D. I
> have played around with the control electronics for both AMA Free flight
> indoor duration and for RC indoor duration. If people think that the BOM
> rule is difficult to enforce, such enforcement is nothing compared to
> enforcing keeping RC out of indoor FF if electronics are present. Adding
> RC to a controller, say for the stab incidence, adds weight in the few of
> milligrams only and is straightforward. The weight is mainly in the
> actuator(s) and the battery, not mainly in the electronics.
>
> LeoP
>
>
>
Received on Tue Feb 18 2014 - 06:44:47 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET