It's easy for an expert to say "bring your overweight A-6 to fly anyway".
I'm sure we all remember Animal House... "Pledge him, we need the DUES!"
DD
Don DeLoach
Sent from my iPhone
On May 14, 2012, at 1:56 PM, "John Kagan" <john_kagan_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Don DeLoach <ddeloach_at_...> wrote:
> >
> > Art's frustration as a beginner to A-6 is illuminating.
> >
> > Don DeLoach
>
> It sure is. Too many people get consumed with super light weight. There are many factors that go into a good-flying model, and weight is just one of them.
>
> The whole EZB conversation is another example. Richmond did well with a very light EZB, so everyone has it in their head that you have to build .3gm to be competitive. But, if a .5 or .6gm model does better than your .3gm noodle, is that really so? Kang's heavier model clearly flew better than the too-flimsy lighter one at Lakehurst. Once he accepted that fact, he put up some really nice times.
>
> Art, I recommend that you finish the A-6 you are working on and bring it to fly. If you have time, try for a lighter one after you have finished the first. But, know that having something to fly and learn with will be much more valuable than the hope of something better for next year.
>
> Also, you may want to consider building a LPP, too. The weight limit is very accessible with normal wood.
>
> Enjoy the challenge, and try not to get too overwhelmed along the way. Once you get your first A-6 built, you'll have your own weight budget to work off of. Indoor is interestingly challenging, but it doesn't have to be as daunting as it sometimes seems.
>
> And we certainly don't need to "dumb it down".
>
>
Received on Mon May 14 2012 - 13:03:33 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET