Re: Free Flight Rule Proposals

From: <Warthodson_at_aol.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:49:46 EST

 
Jerry,
I will be replying to your email in a few days, but in the meantime I would
like clarification to the rules change below. Also, I have sent this to some of
the freeflight lists in hopes of receiving input from some of the glider
fliers.
The rule seems to assume that all rubber is 1/16" thick, which of course is
not true.
Does this change mean that you can use rubber with the equivalent of 1/4" X
1/16" crossectional area (0.0156 Sq. In)? For example, if the rubber is 0.040"
thick, can you use two strands that are each .195" wide?
 
Also, in the second paragraph below, where it says ....."(or equivalent, i.e.
two strands of ........." shouldn't that read FOUR strands.
   
This proposal is poorly written. Will there be an opportunity to clarify the
wording, or do we have to accept it exactly as written?
Thanks,
Gary Hodson
 
In a message dated 11/27/2007 6:04:21 PM Central Standard Time,
jb_murphy_at_msn.com writes:

OFF-09-3 – Allow options on the size of rubber used in the Catapult Glider
event, equivalent to ¼” x 1/16” currently specified.
 
Free Flight Outdoor Catapult Glider 4.1:
Change: and a two-stranded loop of ¼ inch flat model airplane rubber (FAI,
Pirelli, etc.) made from a piece that is 18 inches long
 
To: and a two-strand loop of ¼ inch (or equivalent, i.e. two stands of 1/8”x
1/16”) rubber (FAI, Pirelli, etc.) made from a piece(s) that is 18 inches long.
 
Logic:
¼ inch rubber is going away. The standards are now 1/8 inch and 3/32 inch.
 
Submitted by: Faust Parker, AMA #15980






**************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest
products.
(http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Wed Dec 05 2007 - 06:50:51 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:45 CET