Re: F1L motors

From: Bill Gowen <b.gowen_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 12:23:01 -0400

I agree about the need for lots of backoff on big motors. The reason that I've stayed with them is that the clock runs longer when I use big motors. I'm not advocating for others to do the same. I'm just trying to get a feel for what others think is "normal". Maybe I'm on the wrong track or maybe my props just like more torque than other people's.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: RLBailey_at_care4free.net
  To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 7:42 AM
  Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] F1L motors


  Bill

  I favour about 0.9 g of very similar thickness to F1D - very convenient! Much more needs a lot of back off on a good day.

  Bob

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Bill Gowen
  To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 1:54 PM
  Subject: [Indoor_Construction] F1L motors

  I tend to use a brute force approach to sizing motors for the events
  that I fly. My F1L motors have been creeping up into the mid-.060 range.
  I was wondering if anyone would want to share info about the sizes
  they've had success with in high ceilings?

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Sun May 13 2007 - 09:23:29 CEST