Re: Re: Prop efficiency at high pitch (was: News from Roman...

From: Fred Tellier <fred-tellier_at_cogeco.ca>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:56:16 -0400

Hi Mark

Do I detect some chain rattling from the west of me,< big grin > it is strange that you and I actually agree on this topic. By the way my second guitar build is going well and now I have learned to flex test tops and bracing, light and stiff are also important in music and C grain ( quarter cut ) wood is best, and most stable. We indoor flyers are not the only ones fanatical about their wood.

Fred

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Mark
  To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 10:42 AM
  Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Prop efficiency at high pitch (was: News from Roman...


  --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Fred Tellier" <fred-
  tellier_at_...> wrote:

>
> We should have a postal event of theories against common practice,>>

  Not a bad idea, Fred! <g> I will be glad to enter postal times on
  behalf on the side that uses only common practice as developed by 60
  years of record setters and contest winners. But would the "thinner
  rubber" adherent be allowed to try thicker rubber after model landed
  with 30% turns left?

  And if the tradtional way wins, would that necessarily blunt future
  proclamations of theories of "better ways to fly?" I would eagerly
  await to read one's "better way theories" if one would have some pride
  and consideration to test it in real flying first, and report actual
  results and times.
  MB



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Tue Mar 20 2007 - 08:56:46 CET