Re: Prop efficiency at high pitch (was: News from Roman...

From: Mark <f1diddler_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:42:01 -0000

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Fred Tellier" <fred-
tellier_at_...> wrote:

>
> We should have a postal event of theories against common practice,>>

Not a bad idea, Fred! <g> I will be glad to enter postal times on
behalf on the side that uses only common practice as developed by 60
years of record setters and contest winners. But would the "thinner
rubber" adherent be allowed to try thicker rubber after model landed
with 30% turns left?

And if the tradtional way wins, would that necessarily blunt future
proclamations of theories of "better ways to fly?" I would eagerly
await to read one's "better way theories" if one would have some pride
and consideration to test it in real flying first, and report actual
results and times.
MB
Received on Tue Mar 20 2007 - 07:42:23 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:45 CET