Re: Re: P-18 vs. AMA WS

From: <Warthodson_at_aol.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 23:53:12 -0400

Bill,
I am not "all worked up" about the tie thing. I am simply stating my opinion that a 2 min. Max makes P-18 a pointless event.
You say: "If a flyer wants to get credit for flights over two minutes they can, in LPP." This does not in any way change the pointlessness of the 2 min. max P-18 event.

Also, if the purpose of the 2 Min Max P-18 event is the encourage beginners & discourage experienced fliers why are you going to fly it? You are certainly an experienced flyer?
I am done discussing this.

Gary Hodson
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: William Carney wcarneyjx_at_gmail.com [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>
To: Indoor_Construction <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sat, Jun 18, 2016 6:01 pm
Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: P-18 vs. AMA WS



  
    
                  

Gary,
Sure, I'll fly P-18. I even designed a model that meets the provisional rules. It'll do two minutes most of the time, but not always. In the hands of beginners I don't see the whole field maxing out. Sure, I'll max out and put it away and tell any kid who ties me they get free bag of stripped rubber in the size of their choice or a kit or whatever.
I can tell this tie thing really has you worked up. I'm sure I can explain what I am suggesting better. There don't have to be any ties. If a tie is so abhorrent to anyone they can place last in LPP instead of tieing for first in P-18. If they want to do better in LPP then they build real LPP and the hook is truly set by then.
Bill C
On Jun 17, 2016 4:19 PM, "Warthodson_at_aol.com [Indoor_Construction]" <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
 
  
    
                  

That does not solve anything. It is still a pointless event. I have been trying to think of an other event where the best you can do is tie. So far I can't think of one. Monopoly, Ping-Pong, foot race, crocket, SO, spelling bee, dodge ball.
Bill, will you be flying P-18?
Gary Hodson
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: William Carney wcarneyjx_at_gmail.com [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>
To: Indoor_Construction <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, Jun 17, 2016 3:44 pm
Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: P-18 vs. AMA WS


 
  
    
                  

Gary,


I probably never fully explained my proposal. I was too busy having to explain what a beginner gets out of a beginner event. My proposal includes a provision that if the flyer gets a flight of more then two minutes they can score that flight in LPP. What this does is provide a framework for them to get to be able to do two minutes with a P-18. Once they can do that consistently buy are getting beat in LPP they'll have motivation to build a LPP.


Bill C



On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Warthodson_at_aol.com [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
 
  
    
                  

I have been reading all the messages on the P-18 vs. SO subject & I have only one strong opinion: A 2 minute MAX creates a pointless event & I think even a beginner would agree.
Gary Hodson
 
 




    
             
  



    

             

  




    
             
  



    
             

  


    
             

  
Received on Sat Jun 18 2016 - 20:53:14 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET