Re: Re: P-18 plans and Specs

From: Don DeLoach <ddeloach_at_comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 12:11:56 -0600

Not true. The ballots have not even been mailed yet. They go out April 15 and are due back at AMA May 1.


DD


> On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Jake Palmer 82.jake_at_gmail.com [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> My understanding is the vote happened on 3/15. This was just before I joined the board so I don't know the results.
>
> Right now I would agree with Josh that adding it as an unofficial event doesn't make much sense because it complicates the process of adjusting the rules. I'm building one now, and I plan to fly it tomorrow so I'll have firsthand knowledge of the event in case it comes up for a vote again.
>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:43 AM, joshuawfinn_at_gmail.com [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>
>> I still fail to see the benefit of having P-18 be an official "unofficial" event. What benefit is there to the beginner to have it be AMA recognized? It gets held at the contest either way, and the rules are *much* easier to edit as needed for availability or what have you. Those edits are going to happen either way in practice, but now, there's an official set of rules to confuse beginners with yet further.
>>
>>
>>
>> If this absolutely has to be an official event, the prop size thing needs to be settled *now*. You don't vote in favor of legislation (or rules proposals) that still need fixing and for which support for the fix has not been consolidated.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Joshua Finn
>>
>
>
Received on Fri Apr 01 2016 - 13:49:10 CEST