Re: Re: Are there too many Indoor events?

From: Don Slusarczyk <don_at_slusarczyk.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:49:20 -0500

Bill,

I though your tandem was ~5" chord on wing and stab right? I am talking
about 8" or so chord wing and a 5" chord stab. Then with about a 1" nose
leaves about 4" from the trailing edge of the wing and leading edge of
the stab. They start to act different that close coupled. I always
thought 8" chord monplane like that out cruised a biplane. They can do
good time from low height, trying to get them to climb, cruise and
descend is when the fun starts. The last USIC I attended at ETSU my dad
an I had two identical 8" OPP models built, we both tried independently
to get them to climb, cruise, and descend properly then tried to mix and
match what we were doing. CG, total incidence, incidence distribution
from wing to tail etc. We usually could get 2 of 3, by the end of the
contest we decided we needed my dads climb out and beginning of the
cruise and my models mid cruise and descent to win :-)

On 2/1/2016 6:31 PM, 'William D. gowen' wdgowen_at_gmail.com
[Indoor_Construction] wrote:
>
> My tandem was steady as a rock. But I see the point.
>
> On 2/1/2016 6:27 PM, linardic_at_yahoo.com [Indoor_Construction] wrote:
>>
>> Don
>> All you are saying about opennpennyplane I confirm. Monoplanes are
>> too unprodictable I feel also due to beiing too short coupled. I flew
>> a 8 inch chord model for a while a disaster. I could not get both the
>> cruise and climb dialed in. On this note old f1d and todays int stick
>> are rigid models and you know the settings and can exploit the mid
>> hight torque to get a slow long climb and super cruise. Something not
>> possible with the variable geometry airframes of thebrestricted
>> rubber weight. Once upon a time I had a model a biplane with a narrow
>> chord 24 inch stab this resolved the issue but was out ruled the year
>> after at usic. This model climbed as if it was on rails! So now its
>> either you fly a biplane with donthrust or no point!
>> Othervise a great event and increasing the length of open pp may
>> allow for monoplanes to be competetive and get away from the rubber
>> restricted F1M! Back to te same question we have so many restrictive
>> events!
>>
>> Vladimir Linardic
>>
>
>

-- 
Don Slusarczyk
Received on Mon Feb 01 2016 - 15:49:24 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET