Re: Re: Are there too many Indoor events?

From: William D. gowen <wdgowen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:31:51 -0500

My tandem was steady as a rock. But I see the point.

On 2/1/2016 6:27 PM, linardic_at_yahoo.com [Indoor_Construction] wrote:
>
> Don
> All you are saying about opennpennyplane I confirm. Monoplanes are too
> unprodictable I feel also due to beiing too short coupled. I flew a 8
> inch chord model for a while a disaster. I could not get both the
> cruise and climb dialed in. On this note old f1d and todays int stick
> are rigid models and you know the settings and can exploit the mid
> hight torque to get a slow long climb and super cruise. Something not
> possible with the variable geometry airframes of thebrestricted rubber
> weight. Once upon a time I had a model a biplane with a narrow chord
> 24 inch stab this resolved the issue but was out ruled the year after
> at usic. This model climbed as if it was on rails! So now its either
> you fly a biplane with donthrust or no point!
> Othervise a great event and increasing the length of open pp may allow
> for monoplanes to be competetive and get away from the rubber
> restricted F1M! Back to te same question we have so many restrictive
> events!
>
> Vladimir Linardic
>
>
Received on Mon Feb 01 2016 - 15:31:54 CET