In general, waiting to see if proposals have been submitted to AMA or FAI is a mistake. Prior discussion is important in shaping the proposals or at least communicating possible problems with proposed rule changes. The other problem with waiting is that proposals can be submitted right before the deadline and there is little, or no, opportunity to develop and submit a more well thought out counter-proposal.
Chuck Etherington
From: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com [mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 5:29 PM
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Rules changes
I am just going to wait to see if there are actually submitted to the AMA for changes. If they are officially proposed then I think it will be time to address each point individually.
On 1/6/2016 12:25 PM, joshuawfinn_at_gmail.com<mailto:joshuawfinn_at_gmail.com> [Indoor_Construction] wrote:
I do want to jump in with one additional comment--I don't want anyone to to think that I opposed the publishing of Wally's article. While I disagree with it, the dialogue is potentially beneficial to the indoor community.
-jf
--
Don Slusarczyk
Received on Thu Jan 07 2016 - 10:25:33 CET
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET