Re: Details and background

From: Don DeLoach <ddeloach_at_comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 01:24:54 -0600

Sorry, fat-fingered the send button.


DD


Sent from my iPhone


> On May 1, 2014, at 1:18 AM, Don DeLoach <ddeloach_at_comcast.net> wrote:
>
> I agree that this treatise was thoughtful and well written but it is mostly devoid of persuasive reasoning.
>
> 1. F1D is dying because the models fly too long? Therefore, make them fly 25:00 instead of 35:00 and new flyers will be attracted? I don't see the cause and effect.
> 2. There are only two WCh sites on the planet, therefore, drastically change the model specification? Huh? Forgive me but this is absurd.
3. The model specification needed to be drastically changed because F1D flyers don't know what's good for them? Andras: did you poll any F1D flyers outside of the European clique you fly with regularly?


DD


>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Apr 29, 2014, at 5:47 PM, "John Barker" <john.barker783_at_ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear András,
>>
>> Thank you for the very clear and comprehensive explanation of the matters leading up to the recent F1D rule change. It must have been a major piece of work , gathering all the information and arranging it into a readable summary. I suppose that some of the information would be in languages other than your own and to have it presented to us in very clear English is much appreciated. Thank You.
>>
>> John Barker
>>
>>
>>

>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com [mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of András Reé
>> Sent: 28 April 2014 23:08
>> To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Details and background
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I have promised to put together the details and background of the rule change.
>>
>> Please, find attached them in a two page docx file.
>>
>> My intention is not to reopen the discussion, just to share information which are probably not widely known.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Andras
>>

>>
>>
>> BTW what is the height of Kent?
>>
>>
>>
Received on Thu May 01 2014 - 13:23:25 CEST