Re: Y2K2
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: <
ykleetx_at_gmail.com
>
Date
: 16 Apr 2014 22:36:49 -0700
Thanks,
How about this photo of Lutz's model from ECh 2013?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/airsports_fai/9686297180/in/set-72157635399569687
https://www.flickr.com/photos/airsports_fai/9686297180/in/set-72157635399569687
And Zoltan's model:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/airsports_fai/9686297118/in/set-72157635399569687/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/airsports_fai/9686297118/in/set-72157635399569687/
Looking through this set, I see that most models use Y2K2, I think.
Received on
Wed Apr 16 2014 - 22:36:49 CEST
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
ykleetx_at_gmail.com: "Re: Y2K2"
Previous message
:
Tapio Linkosalo: "Re: Re: Analysis of the new F1D rules"
In reply to
:
Nicholas Ray: "Re: Y2K2"
Next in thread
:
ykleetx_at_gmail.com: "Re: Y2K2"
Reply
:
ykleetx_at_gmail.com: "Re: Y2K2"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET