There is no change in the implementation procedure of new rules, it is the same as
15 years ago. The description of LeoP is fully correct.
Andras
2014.04.14. 23:38 keltezéssel, Jake Palmer írta:
>
>
> This has obviously changed in the last 15 years then. I looked though the INAV
> archives and found an article by Steve Brown from mid 1999 shortly after the 55cm
> rules were passed. They didn't go into effect until the beginning of 2001. This
> seems much more logical to vote on rules 2 years before they go into effect.
>
> Also a direct quote from that article "The CIAM Free Flight Subcommittee is
> composed mostly of outdoor flyers and voted 14-5 in favor of the agenda proposed
> by Hungary. Apparently the Subcommittee referenced the perceived success of
> performance restrictions in F1B and F1C and applied this philosophy to indoor
> models. U.S. input was not incorporated in the final specification." - Steve Brown
>
> Deja vu all over again. This time around they used a lack of high ceiling sites
> as the excuse.
>
> If you can't beat them, change the rules. If you still can't beat them, change
> the rules again.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:04 PM, <leop_at_lyradev.com <mailto:leop_at_lyradev.com>> wrote:
>
> The FAI F1D rule changes were done according to the FAI regulations as rule
> changes are to be voted on in the year of the World Championship. This
> April's CIAM Plenary meeting is the FAI specified time for the vote and
> January 1, 2015, is the specified time for the rules to take effect. There is
> now a two year rule freeze and the next time rules changes can be voted upon
> (except for rules involving urgent safety issues or indispensable rule
> clarifications) is during the Spring, 2016, CIAM Plenary meeting (the same
> meeting for normally awarding the 2018 WC site).
>
>
> LeoP
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 15 2014 - 07:34:49 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET