Thanks, William
LeRoy
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:42:43 -0500 William Gowen <wdgowen_at_gmail.com>
writes:
I think it's most likely left over 2/99. If so then it's probably pretty
good. Not quite up to 5/99 or 3/02 but better than anything else.
On Feb 10, 2014 10:37 AM, "mkirda_at_sbcglobal.net" <mkirda_at_sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
Hi LeRoy.
I don't have the info in front of me, but going from memory:
5/99 has total energy of about 4000 with higher mid-torque curve.
3/99 has total energy of about 3600.
So 10% worse roughly.
I have some I could strip up for you if you want to try it.
Also some TanII of unknown vintage.
Regards.
Mike Kirda
--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, LeRoy C Cordes <lcordes_at_...>
wrote:
>
> Does anyone have info comparing 3/99 Tan II to 5/99 ?
>
> LeRoy Cordes YOLO
> Chicago, Illinois
> AMA 16974 - WAA Pilot #337
> In God We Trust
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Fast, Secure, NetZero 4G Mobile Broadband. Try it.
> http://www.netzero.net/?refcd=NZINTISP0512T4GOUT2
>
____________________________________________________________
LeRoy Cordes YOLO
Chicago, Illinois
AMA 16974 - WAA Pilot #337
In God We Trust
____________________________________________________________
Do THIS before eating carbs (every time)
1 EASY tip to increase fat-burning, lower blood sugar & decrease fat storage
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/52fa37925d46937926ddcst02vuc
- application/x-ygp-stripped attachment: stored
- application/x-ygp-stripped attachment: stored
Received on Tue Feb 11 2014 - 06:46:09 CET