I think it's most likely left over 2/99. If so then it's probably pretty
good. Not quite up to 5/99 or 3/02 but better than anything else.
On Feb 10, 2014 10:37 AM, "mkirda_at_sbcglobal.net" <mkirda_at_sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
>
>
> Hi LeRoy.
>
> I don't have the info in front of me, but going from memory:
> 5/99 has total energy of about 4000 with higher mid-torque curve.
> 3/99 has total energy of about 3600.
>
> So 10% worse roughly.
>
> I have some I could strip up for you if you want to try it.
> Also some TanII of unknown vintage.
>
> Regards.
> Mike Kirda
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, LeRoy C Cordes <lcordes_at_...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone have info comparing 3/99 Tan II to 5/99 ?
> >
> > LeRoy Cordes YOLO
> > Chicago, Illinois
> > AMA 16974 - WAA Pilot #337
> > In God We Trust
> >
> > __________________________________________________________
> > Fast, Secure, NetZero 4G Mobile Broadband. Try it.
> > http://www.netzero.net/?refcd=NZINTISP0512T4GOUT2
> >
>
>
>
Received on Mon Feb 10 2014 - 07:42:44 CET