Re: Re: Exact Builder of Model Rule

From: Don Slusarczyk <don_at_slusarczyk.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 11:19:47 -0500

Interesting that you define it as fraud for a degree as it will destroy
the value of it yet do not extend that respect to the F1D model for a
hobby which you admittedly love. I feel it is equally fraudulent and
will destroy the value of F1D just as it would destroy the value of a
college degree. I went to college for engineering as I found that topic
interesting, it was my "hobby" so why not just let me buy answers to
homework and tests for my "hobby" of engineering? The more engineers the
better for the future of the engineering hobby right? My point here is
the argument can and does work both ways, I find the basis for allowing
a purchased F1D as equally fraudulent as buying answers to a test.

> I think there is a tiny difference between helping each other with a
> hobby we love (which is good for the future of it) and 'helping' each
> other with fraud at university (which will definitely destroys the
> value of the degree).
> Don't you agree?
>
>
Received on Sun Feb 09 2014 - 08:19:36 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET