Re: Question for John Kagan

From: Yuan Kang Lee <ykleetx_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:47:46 -0000

Uh-oh, the dots are getting connected ...

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Leo Pilachowski" wrote:
>
> John,
>
> Please excuse my age related forgetfulness. Can you explain your "chicken sexer" theory? I know Kang has a KFC theory. Are the chickens somehow related?
>
> Leo
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "John Kagan" wrote:
> >
> > --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Don DeLoach wrote:
> > >
> > > Model rigidity?
> > >
> > > DD
> > >
> >
> > When I built my first old-rules F1Ds, Steve Brown commented that they looked too stiff. And he was right. My next set that were more appropriately flexible flew better.
> >
> > Now, is it just because the first model was too heavy, and the new one was lighter? I dunno. But a model with a certain amount of aero-elasticity just looks right (this gets back to my "chicken sexer" theory)
> >
>
Received on Thu Jan 31 2013 - 15:47:49 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET