Re: Int Stick

From: John Kagan <john_kagan_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 04:24:55 -0000

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Don Slusarczyk wrote:
>
> I don't think it is close to the same thing (at least not to me).

That's the problem with attempting to phase out any category: there's always at least one person who loves it :)

We definitely aren't getting rid of Int Stick now, however (nor PP, for that matter). Just trying to come up with some justification, one way or the other, for arranging their location on the schedule. If we run F1M and PP concurrently, and everyone switches over to F1M, then great. If not, that's fine, too.

While we are on the subject, does anyone have any big objection to mothballing SLS and RTP? It doesn't have to be permanent, but it would ease the scheduling for now.
Received on Thu Jan 03 2013 - 20:24:57 CET