I agree with Mike, without a definition of BOM it is not clear what each individual voter really intends. In addition, not all of the options in the survey are mutually exclusive. What if a person is for AMA/FAI BOM & also for some non BOM events? They should be able to select both options.
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: mkirda <mkirda_at_sbcglobal.net>
To: Indoor_Construction <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thu, Oct 25, 2012 7:27 pm
Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: New poll for Indoor_Construction
I do feel that kits should be allowed, if offered, assuming the builder has to assemble (glue together) the parts.
This fine distinction is lost in this survey.
Regards.
Mike Kirda
--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
>
> Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> Indoor_Construction group:
>
> I feel that the threshold for allowed components/materials in the Builder of the Model rule for F1D:
> (note that this is not a scientific survey, and its results should not be interpreted to represent the Indoor community's opinion as a whole. For example, the sampling pool only includes members of this online forum who choose to participate.)
>
> o Should include VP hubs
> o Should not include VP hubs
>
>
> To vote, please visit the following web page:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Indoor_Construction/surveys?id=2440336
>
> Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> web site listed above.
>
> Thanks!
>
Received on Fri Oct 26 2012 - 06:46:47 CEST