Re: BOM vs BAM

From: Mark F1diddler <f1diddler_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:36:44 -0000

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "jakep_82" <82.jake@...> wrote:
>
> It's a tradition in that it's been a part of indoor since indoor has existed>>.

Agreed!

 <<Has anyone ever competed at the world champs with a "bought" model regardless of whether BOM rules existed in the early years? I doubt it.>>

World Champs? Entire model? Probably not, but today some are saying a purchased VP begins to reverse that tradition.

BTW, I have read accounts of competitors (in F1d) giving a friend a wing when friend had destroyed last wing. That aside, the general ethic and appreciation for BOM is on our side--that's the safe aspect. I'm merely claiming AMA rules do not properly reflect what is already common practice for indoor. Additionally, a better rule could/should solve the pre-made VP problem, at least domestically as far as that goes (which isn't very far for F1d flyers if FAI ends up permanently accepting pre-made VPs hubs.)

The only finished manufactured indoor models I know of is "Bulldog" and "Butterfly" if they are still around. (Or were they too heavy that they all have died from crashing? I don't know.) If latent interest exists for flying this or any kind of pre-made model, then someone who likes it should promote such a non-BOM class. Ideally locally first, then let it catch on, IMO.
MB
Received on Thu Oct 25 2012 - 15:36:46 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET