I am for the BOSOM rule: Builder Of Some Of Model.
--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "f1diddler" <f1diddler@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "John Barker"
> <john.barker783_at_> wrote:
>
>
> << truth to tell, I had forgotten that English Indoor flyers had had
> another go at writing a BOM rule, which now reads as follows:
> The entrant must be the constructor of the model. The constructor may
> employ generally available building aids or small components in the
> production of their model but the airframe must be the competitor's own
> work.
> >
> > All the Indoor flyers I have met I regard as my friends so I hope none
> will be offended when I say that I think this 'new rule' only supports
> my contention that NOBODY COULD WRITE A SENSIBLE BOM RULE. >>
>
>
>
> I fail to understand how a rule that is incomplete and/or fails to
> anticipate prickly problems as they arise is therefore NOT SENSIBLE, and
> therefore discarded in favor of something that instates the opposite
> intention of the erstwhile rule--BAM (Buy A Model.)
> MB
>
Received on Mon Oct 22 2012 - 18:28:47 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET