--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "John Barker"
<john.barker783_at_...> wrote:
<< truth to tell, I had forgotten that English Indoor flyers had had
another go at writing a BOM rule, which now reads as follows:
The entrant must be the constructor of the model. The constructor may
employ generally available building aids or small components in the
production of their model but the airframe must be the competitor's own
work.
>
> All the Indoor flyers I have met I regard as my friends so I hope none
will be offended when I say that I think this 'new rule' only supports
my contention that NOBODY COULD WRITE A SENSIBLE BOM RULE. >>
I fail to understand how a rule that is incomplete and/or fails to
anticipate prickly problems as they arise is therefore NOT SENSIBLE, and
therefore discarded in favor of something that instates the opposite
intention of the erstwhile rule--BAM (Buy A Model.)
MB
Received on Mon Oct 22 2012 - 18:21:15 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET