RE: Re: what is difficult in building indoor duration

From: Don DeLoach <ddeloach_at_comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:38:42 -0600

Nothing.

 

But are you really planning to stir this hornet's nest regardless? What if
half or more of the current WC flyers had purchased hubs?

 

And how are you going to ensure that purchased hubs are not used from now
on? Demand video evidence of their construction?

 

I guess my point is that allowing purchased hubs for the next rules cycle
seems like a reasonable compromise, given that a) so many people already
have them, b) they're only 80Euro and c) they are likely to be usable from
model to model over several (many?) years.

 

But, I am no F1D flyer so ignore my commentary if you wish.

 

DD

  _____

From: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John Kagan
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:22 PM
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: what is difficult in building indoor
duration

 

  

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Indoor_Construction%40yahoogroups.com> , Don DeLoach <ddeloach_at_...>
wrote:
>
> I wonder how many of these Treger VPs have already sold.
>
> Seems like the horse is out of the barn.
>

What would the number of VP prop hubs sold have to do with their violating
the BOM rule or not?
Received on Thu Oct 18 2012 - 04:17:36 CEST