Re: Re: what is difficult in building indoor duration

From: charles salvo <charles_salvo2000_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:15:48 -0700 (PDT)

 I do not have a dog in
this race, but if Ivan made a kit of his hub would the suspect models
in question now be OK because the modeler assembled the hub? When you
buy a kit and assemble or build it (not arf ) you are considered
the builder of the model even when you put a store bought motor to
power it. I have built a few indoor EZ B’s and used a Harlan
bearing, and I have always considered myself the BOM and not a
cheater. I have built a few indoor EZ B's and used a Harlan bearing
and I have always considered myself the BOM and not a cheater. If
you do not pour your own microfilm but construct everything else
would you not be considered the BOM, then everyone who uses store
bought tissue on their tissue stick models cannot be considered the
BOM. I know that what I stated seems to be a stretch but most of what
I read you all seem to try to pick the fly dung out of the pepper 

________________________________
 From: Tapio Linkosalo <tapio.linkosalo_at_iki.fi>
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: what is difficult in building indoor duration
  
 
 
 
On 14.10.2012 10:01, Akihiro Danjo wrote:
> If so, it must be used except for contest flights. I believe RTF or ARF VP
> mechanisms violate BOM rule of FAI Sporting Code.

I have wondered this thing myself too, that the buying the single most
important part of the model does not violate the BOM rule. But, such
seems to be the interpretation of the rule.

-Tapio-
   
         
Received on Sun Oct 14 2012 - 20:15:49 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET