Re: Re: a bet (with apologies to The Moderator)

From: Jake Palmer <82.jake_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:35:58 -0700

Don,

How would a random sampling of NFFS guys have any clue or insight into
indoor if they don't actually participate? A lot of guys that fly outdoor
have zero interest in indoor. Are they supposed to know why or if indoor
is "ailing"? And to that end I actively dislike what outdoor has become
without a BOM rule. Does that mean I should speak on behalf of the outdoor
guys even thought I don't fly outdoor?

Elitist indoorist,
Jake

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Don DeLoach <ddeloach_at_comcast.net> wrote:

> **
>
>
> I respectfully disagree Mike. The responses from this survey will be
> invaluable to the newly-formed NFFS Indoor Committee as they build an
> agenda for upcoming discussions.****
>
> ** **
>
> DD****
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com [mailto:
> Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *mkirda_at_sbcglobal.net
> *Sent:* Monday, July 02, 2012 4:10 PM
> *To:* Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* [Indoor_Construction] Re: a bet (with apologies to The
> Moderator)****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> This thread starting to get silly and non-constructive, guys. Shouldn't
> you be sharing tips on building your next (F1D, insert your poison here) or
> securing the next great flying site?
>
> Mike****
>
>
>
Received on Mon Jul 02 2012 - 15:35:59 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET