Re: Re: Indoor Housekeeping (with apologies to the innocent)

From: Fred or Judy Rash <frash_at_chartertn.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:05:20 -0400

Stay the course, Mark. I appreciate what you are doing and trying to do.

Occasionally I contribute I hope positively and sometime inadvertently
negatively. This forum is important to people that do not have a large
group of nearby indoor flyers. I assume that is virtually everybody.

Fred Rash

On 6/30/2012 5:08 PM, Mark F1diddler wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Indoor_Construction%40yahoogroups.com>, William Gowen
> <wdgowen_at_...> wrote:
> >
> > My recollection is that thus group was renamed a number of years ago
> > because of fights breaking out over rules.
>
> Bill,
> Group not merely renamed, because Don S's old Yahoo Group was in fact
> shut down, and I started from scratch with the exception of having
> access to the original members' addresses (as any member would also
> have access.) But with Don S's blessing, I personally invited every
> original (Ind_Const) member to join upon the then impending closing of
> Don's Yahoo Indoor. I kinda forget exactly how the rules arguments
> played a part, but my original trigger was when a member taunted us
> with RC glider references, and DS was already burned out at that point.
>
> As for what to try to change now, I'll wait a couple days for others
> to weigh in if they wish. I'm open about it, and can go either
> way--more strict, more liberal, or stay the course. (But I wonder if
> anyone realizes what they are saying in suggesting, "no rules
> discussion." How to enforce that, and where else ya gonna talk with as
> many indoor adults in the room?)
> Thanks,
> MB
>
>
Received on Sat Jun 30 2012 - 15:05:24 CEST