The last time we had a heated A6 discussion was May 18, 2011. Funny, almost exactly 1 year ago today. The result then was that several prominent members left this group, for the worse, I believe.
In the mean time, we've had quite a few discussions on A6 that simmered but was never a blow out. And, overall, I enjoyed those discussions. What was missing from those discussions was extreme nastiness.
I prefer discussions where we show each other some respect.
Respecfully,
-Kang
--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Mark F1diddler" <f1diddler@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Don DeLoach" <ddeloach@> wrote:
> >
> > --Extreme materials and techniques are required to be competitive (absurdly
> > light and stiff wood)
> >
> > --The best materials are not even made anymore (Y2K, May 99, light C-paper)
> >
> > --Poorly written rules that are exploited by experts (VP prop on A-6, plenty
> > of other examples)
> >
> > --A prevailing attitude that indoor is just fine and does not need to grow
> > or improve.
> > Those are the main points. The one point that Diddiler did not mention is
> > sites.
>
>
> Wow, my post proved all that? Didn't realize I was that articulate. But you raise valid concerns, and I hope several others will address them, for the third or fourth time.
> MB
>
Received on Mon May 14 2012 - 16:47:30 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET