Re: Re: Double strand motors?

From: Phedon Tsiknopoulos <phedon21t_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 10:58:42 -0700 (PDT)

How right you are Tapio. I guess no matter how you cut it, it's always
self-compensating. Only a CRAY SUPER COMPUTER could possibly resolve our never
ending technical issues here. Ciao, Phedon.




________________________________
From: Tapio Linkosalo <tapio.linkosalo_at_iki.fi>
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, May 4, 2011 10:48:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Double strand motors?

 
On 4.5.2011 19:47, Phedon Tsiknopoulos wrote:
> But you do not fly by stretching, you fly by winding. As the strands are
> stripped finer the cross section of the motor in question assumes a more
> perfectly cylindrical cross section as opposed to a rectangular one,
> which will develop higher torque since it's further away from the
> neutral point.

Then again, with more strands you get more rubbing and friction of
strands against each other....

To Bill's comment about using that "waste" rubber: incidentally it seems
that when I cut a 3.2mm (1/8") strip, I get 1.2mm for F1D and the
remainder 2.0mm is just fine for F1M. Or vice versa. Anyway these two go
together well :-)

-Tapio-
Received on Wed May 04 2011 - 10:58:44 CEST