Re: Re: Kent Contest extended hours??? UPDATE

From: Phedon Tsiknopoulos <phedon21t_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 06:47:26 -0700 (PDT)

I assume that you mean 3 to 4 millionths of an inch,




________________________________
From: Bill Gowen <wdgowen_at_gmail.com>
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, April 5, 2011 9:24:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Kent Contest extended hours??? UPDATE

 

.3 to .4 according to my info.

----- Original Message -----
>From: Phedon Tsiknopoulos
>To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 1:53 PM
>Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Kent Contest extended hours??? UPDATE
>
> 
>On a diff. subject, do you know the thickness in microns of Y2K2 film?
>
>
>
>
________________________________
From: ray_harlan <rbharlan_at_comcast.net>
>To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Mon, April 4, 2011 6:45:25 AM
>Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Kent Contest extended hours??? UPDATE
>
> 
>This issue isn't specifically addressed in the rules. There is nothing that
>recognizes record trials flying after a contest, just the continuation of a
>series of flights after a contest, which doesn't pertain to indoors.
>
>Will there be a separate sanction for the extra time at Kent? If so, the
>two-timers rule would be in effect. If not, There could be a challenge to the
>legitimacy of any records set, I think.
>
>Ray
>
>--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Bill Gowen" <wdgowen_at_...> wrote:
>>
>> My further interpretation is that if you're flying an event that isn't listed
>>as a contest event then the 2 timer rule is in effect. Is this correct?
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: ray_harlan
>> To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 10:09 AM
>> Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Kent Contest extended hours??? UPDATE
>>
>> Keep in mind that if the event is a contest, only one timer is required, but it
>>can't be the CD.
>>
>> Ray
>>
>> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Don Slusarczyk <don_at_> wrote:
>> >
>> > Unfortunately that still happens. When I first became a CD (~20 years
>> > ago) there was no such rule, all that was required was two stop watches.
>> > The rules were changed to then two separate timers (both timers had to
>> > be AMA members) and the CD may not be one of the timers. That rule
>> > change was so long ago I can not see any excuse for a CD not knowing it
>> > at this point. Perhaps the AMA should go back to mailing CDs current
>> > copies of the rule books when they send the sanction paperwork back.
>> >
>> > Don
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I wish the CD who timed me on Dec. 10, 2010 was aware of that ruling.
>> > > To make a long story short the CAT I , CLT , UNLIMITED record that I
>> > > broke that night was thrown out. And so was the electric record that a
>> > > junior broke. Thanks for answering, and good luck with records, I wish
>> > > I could make it to that site. Ciao, Phedon.
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Received on Wed Apr 06 2011 - 06:47:28 CEST