Re: Helicopter Design

From: Bill Carney <wcarneyjx_at_bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 07:58:27 -0800 (PST)

I agree that winding a two  free rotor design is a two person operation. We wind
ours on the chopper as we're not flying by torque but winding to max turns all
the time. It takes a bit of practice but so far hasn't been any real concern.

Eric,
  Which regional did you attend Saturday? One of my helicopters won a regional
in IL Saturday but I'm not sure which region. The report I got was that almost
all the Helicopters got caught in the rafters including the winner.

Bill C




________________________________
From: Bill Gowen <wdgowen_at_gmail.com>
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, March 7, 2011 9:40:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Helicopter Design

 
Eric
I designed a helicopter that my SO kid wound up not using. Originally I had
bearings on both ends. It was a nightmare to get a wound motor on. If you were
winding the motor on the helicopter and had 2 team members then it wouldn't be
as difficult but that would mean you'd give up using a torque meter to wind.
 
Eventually I built a new motor stick with the lower rotor fixed. This cured the
difficulty of loading the motor and didn't seem to make the copter fly any
worse. If you have one person doing the winding and flying then I wouldn't even
consider using 2 bearings.
 
----- Original Message -----
>From: Eric
>To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 7:17 AM
>Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Helicopter Design
>

>Was watching some of the helicopter event at our SO regional on Saturday. Can
>someone explain if there is a reason to let both rotors turn relative to the
>motor stick versus keeping one rotor fixed to the stick? Seems like I've seen
>successful designs both ways.
>Thanks,
>Eric Monda
>
>
Received on Mon Mar 07 2011 - 07:58:29 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:46 CET