Re: Per the '10-'11 AMA rules for LPP

From: Yuan Kang Lee <ykleetx_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 21:25:53 -0000

F1M is too long and LPP is too short :-)

I am just shooting my mouth -- please don't take offense.

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Don DeLoach" <ddeloach@...> wrote:
>
> Mark B:
>
> It is more like 30 years but otherwise you are absolutely right-LPP
> definitely is not broken.
>
>
>
> F1M is intriguing except for how absurdly long they are. They seem difficult
> to make turn in a small site plus the packing/travel hassles. Another vote
> for LPP!
>
>
>
> Don D
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark F1diddler
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 2:03 PM
> To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Per the '10-'11 AMA rules for LPP
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Indoor_Construction%40yahoogroups.com> , "Yuan Kang Lee"
> <ykleetx_at_> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I would change two things about the LPP:
> >
> > - to allow a larger diameter prop to 14"
> > - to allow a longer overall length, 24", while keeping the motor stick
> length at 10"
> >
> > These items are similar to those used in Europe for the F1M-b "F1M
> beginner" class.>>
>
> Then why not fly F1M-b instead of hoping to change a class which has
> succeeded for 35 years?
>
Received on Sat Mar 05 2011 - 13:26:00 CET