RE: Re: Per the '10-'11 AMA rules for LPP

From: Don DeLoach <ddeloach_at_comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 14:18:27 -0700

Mark B:

It is more like 30 years but otherwise you are absolutely right-LPP
definitely is not broken.

 

F1M is intriguing except for how absurdly long they are. They seem difficult
to make turn in a small site plus the packing/travel hassles. Another vote
for LPP!

 

Don D

 

  _____

From: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark F1diddler
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 2:03 PM
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Per the '10-'11 AMA rules for LPP

 

  



--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Indoor_Construction%40yahoogroups.com> , "Yuan Kang Lee"
<ykleetx_at_...> wrote:
>
>
> I would change two things about the LPP:
>
> - to allow a larger diameter prop to 14"
> - to allow a longer overall length, 24", while keeping the motor stick
length at 10"
>
> These items are similar to those used in Europe for the F1M-b "F1M
beginner" class.>>

Then why not fly F1M-b instead of hoping to change a class which has
succeeded for 35 years?
Received on Sat Mar 05 2011 - 13:18:28 CET