I was just throwing out ideas. I think the event was a big success last year. I hope that it continues in some form next year.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Carney
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: A6 for Pro-Am
Bill,
In my humble opinion, perhaps we should not exclude this years Amateur partcipants from next years event. I hardly think one event is enough to move one from Amateur to Pro in Indoor FFand is it smart to deplete our supply of Amateurs? Perhaps winning the event might be a better criteria for "Pro-moting" them?
Honestly, I'm not sure where I would fit in this scheme. I plan to attend next year and planned to particpate as a "Pro" teaming up with James Strickland who is a newcomer to Indoor and will be going to USIC with me but I hardlty have a resume that says Pro.
Bill Carney
--- On Mon, 10/18/10, Bill Gowen <wdgowen_at_gmail.com> wrote:
From: Bill Gowen <wdgowen_at_gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: A6 for Pro-Am
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, October 18, 2010, 10:48 PM
That brings up another sort of Pro-Am that might be doable next year or at some point in the future. The amateur (or novice or whatever) would build a model and then team with a pro for the competition. It would be the pro's job to teach or help the am to get the most out of their model.
John, do you think there will be enough new amateurs to run another pro-am of some sort next year? I don't think the ams who were in this years event should be able to do it again.
----- Original Message -----
From: jabiruchick
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 8:23 PM
Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: A6 for Pro-Am
Thanks Ken! Count me in for next year's Pro-Am. Pennyplane, A6, or whatever it is.
I can help someone build, then hopefully someone else will help both of us fly! ;-)
--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Ken Achee <ken_at_...> wrote:
>
> Katie,
>
>
> I watched you design, and build a limited penny plane this past spring. You
> don't need duration building lessons, you need to be giving them. It's a
> shame your model got hopelessly snared by the netting in it's early trim
> flights. Next time remember what Fred Rash says, "You paid your money,
> just like everyone else, you get to fly from the middle of the floor too."
>
> How close was that quote Fred?
>
> The Pro-AM was an awesome experience. I hope it continues in some form or
> another.
>
> Ken
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 9:34 PM, jabiruchick <jabiruchick_at_...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I like it!!
> >
> > Personally, I can build, but I'm a beginner at duration build techniques. I
> > didn't do the Pennyplane Pro/Am last year because I didn't feel that I
> > needed a handout airplane, but I regret not doing it because I missed out on
> > so much knowledge (brought to my attention by my buddy Ken Achee!).
> >
> > How about, on one or two evenings early in the contest (or mornings during
> > the Scale competitions), we do a Pro/Am Building Clinic for A6, build a
> > model with the help of a mentor, then go out with our mentor and trim the
> > thing & fly it in the contest? A6 is simple enough for that! And we Am's
> > would learn twice as much, and BOM for future contests wouldn't be an issue.
> > Instead of building a whole plane to give away, the mentors could select
> > some nice materials and bring them to share. (Teach a man to fish...)
> >
> > Katie
> >
> > --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com<Indoor_Construction%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > "ykleetx" <ykleetx_at_> wrote:
> > >
> > > I like the idea of F1L or LPP for the pro-am.
> > >
> > > I like F1L because it has in my opinion the best combination of
> > construction ease and flight performance. Although not as slow flying as an
> > EZB or F1D, it is slow enough that I would call its flight "graceful" and
> > alluring to non-modelers or beginners.
> > >
> > > --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com<Indoor_Construction%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > "olbill61" <wdgowen_at_> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I expected some comments either for or against this idea. What are the
> > feelings about this? John, what do you think?
> > > >
> > > > Another plus that I thought of is that it would probably produce a bump
> > in A6 participation by the experts. We can't just leave it to the KC guys
> > forever!
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
Received on Tue Oct 19 2010 - 08:03:04 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:46 CET