--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Benjamin Saks <bensaks@...> wrote:
>
> Mark I humbly disagree. Any news which indicates an increase in potential
> flying sites for us is 100 % relevant.
Okay, Ben, guess I missed the part where they implied, or where we could infer an "increase in potential flying sites." An awarded contract for airships sure worked out well for "increased potential flying site" regarding Akron, eh?
MB
Received on Thu Oct 07 2010 - 14:59:33 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:46 CET