Re: Re: Indoor_Construction
Mark I humbly disagree. Any news which indicates an increase in potential
flying sites for us is 100 % relevant.
On Oct 7, 2010 5:18 PM, "Mark F1diddler" <f1diddler_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Benjamin Saks <bensaks_at_...>
wrote:
>>
>> i think airships would be on topic. they are the reason we have hangers
to
>> fly in.
>
> And equally tangentially, golf ball technology is the reason we have good
rubber for indoor, but a "golf ball history" article from a golf magazine
would be pretty far fetched for a group supposedly about Indoor Free Flight.
>
> At some point EVERYTHING relates to everything else.
> Mark F1diddler
>
Received on Thu Oct 07 2010 - 14:21:06 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:46 CET