Re: Re: micro film making

From: mark bennett <f1diddler_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 08:17:06 -0700 (PDT)

________________________________
From: gert-jan <gertjanvanwezel_at_yahoo.com>
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, August 8, 2010 5:17:54 AM
Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: micro film making

  
<<please is home better than thru lite poly micro? pleas give me good opinion
about this.
and when i want to bild F1D without boron wath are the tips for that >>

Good opinion? What else is there on Indoor_Construction? (joke)
No, microfilm is not necessarily better than what you are calling "lite
polymicro", if I understand correctly. Probably 95% or more F1d flyers use the
lightest PLASTIC film they can find, not microfilm. The lightest commercially
available plastic is "OS film," perhaps available in Europe from Mike Woodhouse,
Free Flight Supplies. Boron is irrelevant to the covering material. Good
luck.
F1diddler

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Don Slusarczyk <don_at_...> wrote:
>
> This is the best way to go. I spent a lot of money, time, and probably
> fried more brain cells than I can spare making my own microfilm
> solutions and I was still not able to get a film that was stable over a
> year after applied to the frame. So I bought Orsovia film solution and
> wings I covered years ago are sill as good as they were back then.
>
> Don S
>
> > Last I heard, Orsovia Devo's (prolly misspelled)Violet Dream Microfilm is
>still available, and experienced builders report is good. Should be a scan of
>some of his literature here in our Files Section. Everything else I read about
>is "almost right."
> > MB
> >
> >
>


 


      
Received on Sun Aug 08 2010 - 08:17:25 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:46 CET