For a newcomer, I think we should be talking about max rib height. Since the airfoil section essentially has zero thickness, then this height is the same as camber. But that is an aero engineering term that modellers may not be familiar with. The commonality of modelling terms may be a bit different on the other side of the pond.
Ray
--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "John Barker" <john.barker783@...> wrote:
>
> Ray and Fred
> I don't want to be picky but should we be talking about camber instead of thickness. Those of us who have been dabbling in these things for years have shorthand ways of talking that we all understand but Ren, being a newcomer, may be puzzled, particularly after the correction from degrees to percent.
> John
>
Received on Fri Jan 15 2010 - 05:55:29 CET
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:45 CET