Re: Solutions for Indoor FF
--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Don DeLoach" <ddeloach@...> wrote:
>
> Thank you very much Bill. I guess I asked for it by ever bringing this up.
> Indoor FF--like any pursuit--has its share of sad souls who would rather lob
> insults than engage in meaningful, constructive discussions. I pity these
> guys.
DD,
You could have had a nice, meaningful discussion had you not been already seeded the environment with this astute, constructive analysis, May 9.
<<Is it any wonder participation keeps dwindling if the only goal is to appease the old farts?
I am active in both indoor and outdoor FF. My observation is that outdoor is doing much better than indoor because of a general difference in attitude. Outdoor FF clubs/contests are generally more INCLUSIVE. I.e., "Here, kid, chuck this glider!" Contrast this to most indoor groups where EXCLUSITY reigns. "Slow down!" and "Don't touch!" >>
But go ahead, enjoy your newly won victimhood, you've earned it.
Mark B
Received on Tue Jun 02 2009 - 15:45:18 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:45 CET