--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Tapio Linkosalo <tapio.linkosalo@...> wrote:
I first tried to measure these by hand, writing down forces from
a scale at 10cm intervals, but that turned to depend heavily on the
intervals.>>
This "intervals" problem is precisely why I gave up testing individual motors. That, plus any sloppiness in TIME intervals in between readings introduced another variable in results, at least at the beginning of the motor run-down. Your test probably minimizes this by starting at 90% estimated max turns. But I was going for more turns than that. So, I essentially confirmed the already known superior batches, but never was able to extract a clearly superior motor.
And doesn't any change in "degree of break-in" instantly exceed the standard deviation? When a superior break in procedure is found, you can't go to that without getting numbers that can't be compared with yesteryear's procedure, for example.
MB
Received on Sun Mar 08 2009 - 09:58:04 CET
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:45 CET