Hi Tony,
It was just brought to my attention that your letter to the CD
indicates no standard glider. I think you are referring to Standard
catapult glider, event 218. That event is on the entry form sheet so
I do not believe that event has been eliminated like the others you
have in the list.
Cheers,
Kurt
--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Kurt Krempetz
<krempetz_at_...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> I reviewed your letter and have no comments. Job well done!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kurt
>
>
> --- On Thu, 2/12/09, jimmy_otool <jimmy_otool_at_...> wrote:
>
> From: jimmy_otool <jimmy_otool_at_...>
> Subject: [Indoor_Construction] USIC - Comments to the CD
> To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009, 2:56 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all -
>
> Apologies for the delay in getting this together, work has kept me
> quite busy. I've uploaded a draft letter to Van Dover with comments
> regarding USIC 09. The comments were largely provided by a couple of
> folks (thanks guys), and I just reworked them a bit.
>
> http://f1.grp. yahoofs.com/ v1/oIKTSTcAl- kPMbubL2NoddSfTb
ZDStbD3Cd_ nZv5k3aldvf9Dwxa 8mGXDyi49LpphAaB Y2_5C9HN3sSaNYv_
R_mNk6jJZ11slYE/ USIC%202009% 20-%20Working% 20File%20/ Draft%20USIC%
20Comments% 20-%20Feb% 2011%202009. doc
>
> There were also comments about the somewhat confusing nature of the
> AMA forms with official events and non-ama events on different
forms.
> I did not include these comments because from personal experience I
> can tell you that decision and those forms are designed by AMA, and
> Kagan and I took quite a thumping last year when we asked for
changes
> (some of the control line folks just went freaking bonkers - a story
> for another time).
>
> In addition, there were some comments regarding the future (2010 and
> beyond) scheduling of events - spreading out the glider events,
> evening out the time allotted to heavies/light weights etc. I left
> these comments off the letter so as not to confuse the issues and
keep
> the focus on this years event.
>
> Please review the letter. If you have edits, please make them
> directly to the letter and post them as another file in the USIC
folder.
>
> Lastly - I have not included signatories on the letter as of yet. Is
> there someone who would like to volunteer to take the lead on
> communicating with Van as he is not on this group? If no one else
> wants the gig, I'll do it, but I'm not sure I am the best man for
the
> job.
>
> If this has all been sorted out and I've just been out of the loop -
> great, and sorry again for the delay in putting this together.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tony
>
Received on Mon Feb 23 2009 - 19:46:05 CET