Re: Re: Free Flight Rule Proposals

From: <Warthodson_at_aol.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 18:56:12 EST

 
Kurt,
Thanks for the reply. I was hoping to hear from you. Not being a glider
flyer, I must admit I didn't realize there was a difference in the rules pertaining
to rubber for indoor & outdoor gliders. Still, I must question the logic for
changing the poorly conceived existing rule for an equally poorly conceived
new rule.
Eliminating the restriction or a weight limit instead of dimensional limits
makes more sense to me.
Gary Hodson
 
In a message dated 12/5/2007 12:13:14 PM Central Standard Time,
krempetz_at_yahoo.com writes:

The rule proposal you stated below is for outdoor
catapult. Indoor catapult has no limit to the amount
of rubber you can use. I'm not aware of any rule
proposal changes for indoor catapult.
Personally I think this whole rule should be
eliminated and outdoor should be like indoor, no limit
on the rubber.





**************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest
products.
(http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Wed Dec 05 2007 - 15:56:20 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:45 CET